The database includes the following data sources:
| Source |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
| GeoNet Names Server |
- Many places (over 2 million)
- Many alternate names (nearly 3 million)
- Names transliterated consistently according to published standard
|
- No coverage in U.S.
- Many records with poor coordinate precision (1 minute)
- Uneven depth of coverage in different countries and areas of countries
- USBGN standard transliteration not current preferred local method for some areas
|
| USGS GNIS |
- Comprehensive (for U.S.); complementary to GNS
- Good Populations for U.S. (2000 Census)
- Definitive Names (USBGN standard)
|
|
|
Global Gazetteer (download)
|
- Population for many places (over 100,000)
- More comprehensive than GNS for a few countries
- Name rendering more in keeping with local preferences in some areas (including some names in local scripts)
|
- Poor coordinate precision
- Some coordinates missing (particularly for urban agglomerations)
|
| DCW/VMAP1 Populated Place Points (download as VPF via NGA Raster Roam)(alternate download) |
- Very good coordinate accuracy
- Consistent worldwide coverage
|
- Omits secondary cities in urban areas
- Poor name rendering
- No population data
|
| DCW/VMAP1 Built-Up Area Polygon Centroids(download as VPF via NGA Raster Roam)(alternate download) |
- Consistent worldwide coverage
|
- Omits secondary cities in urban areas
- Built-up area polygons frequently include other places than the one named
- Poor name rendering
- No population data
|
| Instituto Nacional De Estadistica Geografia E Informatica (INEGI)(download from CIESIN) |
- Large number of populations
- Many alternate names
|
- Mexico only
- No diacritics in names
|
| Habitats Project (1994) |
- Provides populations and alternate names for some places missed by other datasets
- Good coverage of places and their relationships in urban areas
|
- Poor coordinate accuracy in some areas
- Older populations (mostly early 1990s)
|